LETTER: National Park Service should be embarrassed over paltry number of fish in Elwha

It’s been three years since the Glines Canyon and Elwha dams were removed, and the NPS is touting 16 fish in an area where there should be many more.

Regarding the rock barriers at the former Glines Canyon Dam site in the Elwha River.

In a Sept. 12 Peninsula Daily News article [“ONP Finding Fish In Elwha”], it was stated that fish continue to recolonize the Elwha River watershed and that “an early August snorkel survey between Rica canyon and Glines Canyon … revealed five adult chinook, one steelhead and 10 adult sockeye salmon” were counted.

We know in the summer of 2015, most fish were blocked at the Glines Canyon Dam site, and that’s why the National Park Service blasted away 14 large rocks.

Now the NPS wants to blast four more at the Glines dam site [“More Blasting Done On Elwha River Dam Site,” PDN, Sept. 16].

Is it because of the low numbers of fish in the early August snorkel survey that have the NPS biologists worried?

Acting Park Superintendent Rachel Spector said, “We are thrilled to see this latest confirmation of the success and value of dam removal.”

Does one consider success in a count of 16 fish in one section of river where there should be many more?

This should be a $325 million embarrassment to the National Park Service for the paltry number of fish that have made it past the Glines Canyon Dam barrier.

I’m not buying into the sunshine and butterflies spin from Spector.

The NPS answer to the barrier is, “We will monitor the situation.”

Next year will be the third year since removal of the dams.

How many years do they get until they make it right?

We won’t know till next summer if the blasting was successful.

If not, maybe Congress should monitor the NPS.

Jim Anderson,

Port Angeles

More in Opinion

Pat Neal, left, and former Peninsula Daily News editor and publisher John Brewer. (Pat Neal)
PAT NEAL: Free speech isn’t free

There were giants in the land. We lost one last week. John… Continue reading

The Peninsula Daily News office building, at 305 W. First St. in Port Angeles, will soon be on the commercial real estate market. But staff will relocate to another Port Angeles building in the coming months.
OUR VIEW: We’re moving, but we will remain in community

THIS OLD BUILDING, steeped in history, whispers stories of bygone days. Within… Continue reading

PAT NEAL: The first salmon

THE BLOOMING OF the salmonberries marks a change in the season. In… Continue reading

PAT NEAL: Spill some salmon here

IT WAS ANOTHER tough week in the news. The bad news was… Continue reading

PAT NEAL: The daylight digs

THE END OF steelhead fishing season was the day my universe came… Continue reading

PAT NEAL: Twilight forever and ever

THERE’S A DISTURBING trend in modern journalism for reporters to use fleeting… Continue reading

PAT NEAL: A question of flowers

THANK YOU FOR reading this. Sometimes I think that if you didn’t… Continue reading

PAT NEAL: The de-extinction of the 100-pound salmon

Who says there’s no good news? Recently scientists claimed they are on… Continue reading

Derek Kilmer
POINT OF VIEW: Your neighbors are fighting for a stronger local economy

GROWING UP IN Port Angeles, the hum of mills was more than… Continue reading

PAT NEAL: Smells like spring fever

THERE MAY BE nothing more beautiful than pussywillows in the snow. Unless… Continue reading

LETTER: There he goes again

Last Wednesday, President Joe Biden announced that his administration was once again… Continue reading

PAT NEAL: To build a fire

Camping isn’t just for summer anymore. The woods, beaches and campgrounds are… Continue reading