Justice Charles Johnson, left, Chief Justice Mary Fairhurst, center, and Justice Barbara Madsen, right, listen June 11 as Michele Earl-Hubbard, an attorney for a media coalition led by The Associated Press and Sound Publishing, speaks during a hearing before the state Supreme Court in Olympia regarding a case that will determine whether state lawmakers are subject to the same disclosure rules that apply to other elected officials under the voter-approved Public Records Act. (Elaine Thompson/The Associated Press, File)

Justice Charles Johnson, left, Chief Justice Mary Fairhurst, center, and Justice Barbara Madsen, right, listen June 11 as Michele Earl-Hubbard, an attorney for a media coalition led by The Associated Press and Sound Publishing, speaks during a hearing before the state Supreme Court in Olympia regarding a case that will determine whether state lawmakers are subject to the same disclosure rules that apply to other elected officials under the voter-approved Public Records Act. (Elaine Thompson/The Associated Press, File)

Supreme Court rules state lawmakers subject to records act

By Rachel La Corte

The Associated Press

OLYMPIA — The state Supreme Court ruled Thursday that state lawmakers are subject to the same public disclosure rules that apply to other elected officials and agencies.

In a 7-2 ruling, justices rejected lawmakers’ assertion that they are not required to turn over daily schedules, emails, text messages and other materials related to their work.

Arguments heard in June

The justices heard arguments in June on the appeal of a case that was sparked by a September 2017 lawsuit filed by a media coalition led by The Associated Press that included Sound Publishing1 Inc., which owns the Peninsula Daily News, Sequim Gazette and Forks Forum.

The lawsuit sought sexual harassment reports, calendar entries and other documents.

Lawmakers have long said they are not subject to the law that applies to officials across the state, from school board members and county commissioners to agency heads.

Michele Earl-Hubbard, the attorney for the media coalition, called the ruling a “huge win.”

“We have been hitting a brick wall for more than a decade where lawmakers have been arguing that somehow different rules applied to them,” she said. “We have now proven that’s not true. It was never true.”

The Supreme Court affirmed a Thurston County superior court judge’s ruling in January 2018 that found while the offices of individual lawmakers are subject to the Public Records Act, the House and Senate as a whole are not. The Legislature appealed the portion of the ruling that applies to the legislative offices, and the media outlets appealed the part that applies to the House and Senate.

Following the 2018 decision, lawmakers quickly passed a bill that retroactively exempted them from the law but would have allowed for more limited legislative disclosure for things like daily calendars and correspondence with lobbyists. After a public outcry, Democratic Gov. Jay Inslee vetoed the measure.

While the media won its argument that individual lawmakers must release records, a majority of the Supreme Court justices agreed with the superior court that the disclosure law applies to the entities of the House and the Senate, through the House clerk and secretary of the Senate, in a much more limited way.

The Legislature has made a series of changes to the law, and lawyers for the House and Senate have regularly cited a 1995 revision to a 1971 definition of legislative records in their denials. The House and Senate currently release limited records, including travel, and payroll records and reports to the Legislature.

Attorneys for the Legislature had argued that changes in 2005 and 2007 — when the public-records act’s language and definitions were incorporated into a statute separate from the campaign-finance portions of the original initiative — definitively removed lawmakers from disclosure requirements.

The Legislature, which normally would be represented by the attorney general’s office, chose instead to use two private law firms, paying about $350,000.

The attorney general’s office filed a brief before the high court stating that each lawmaker is fully subject to the public disclosure law, but that the House and Senate are subject in a more limited manner. They said the law specifically defines which records must be made available for release by the House and Senate.

In a statement issued after the ruling, House Speaker-designate Laurie Jinkins said that her caucus was still reviewing the decision but believes “in open and accountable government.”

“While we have already taken action toward better access to public records, we have more work to do,” she wrote.

Twenty news and open government groups signed on to three briefs in support of the media coalition, including the Washington Coalition for Open Government, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Reporters Without Borders and the Society of Professional Journalists.

Besides AP and Sound Publishing, the groups involved in the lawsuit are public radio’s Northwest News Network, KING-TV, KIRO 7, Allied Daily Newspapers of Washington, The Spokesman-Review, the Washington Newspaper Publishers Association, Tacoma News Inc. and The Seattle Times.

The case now heads back to the lower court for further proceedings, including determination of potential penalties and fees.

House and Senate members and guests stand Jan. 15 for the national anthem during a joint session of the state Legislature for the State of the State address by Gov. Jay Inslee in Olympia. (Elaine Thompson/The Associated Press, File)

House and Senate members and guests stand Jan. 15 for the national anthem during a joint session of the state Legislature for the State of the State address by Gov. Jay Inslee in Olympia. (Elaine Thompson/The Associated Press, File)

More in Politics

Port Angeles City Council hopefuls Kate Dexter and Travis Berglund answer questions during a Port Angeles Business Association forum Tuesday. (Jesse Major/Peninsula Daily News)
Port Angeles mayor to run for county commission

Dexter has supported climate action plan, affordable housing

Emily Randall, left, and Hilary Franz.
Stalwarts take sides in race for Kilmer’s seat

A growing constellation of Democratic Party influencers are choosing sides in the… Continue reading

Online learning keeps rising among state’s K-12 students

Online learning for Washington’s public school kids is here to stay. That’s… Continue reading

Jefferson County turnout tops in state

More than half registered voters handed in ballots

Battle narrows to Biden and Trump

Tuesday’s primaries give each the delegates needed for a November contest

Johnson
Clallam commissioner announces bid for third term

Housing, timber revenue among several priorities

Mike Chapman.
Housing discussed at update

Tharinger, Chapman talk about legislation

House, Senate release spending proposals

Supplemental budgets to be negotiated

Plan to cap how much landlords can raise rent moves ahead

Statewide caps on annual rent increases could take effect in… Continue reading

State House approves unemployment benefits for strikers

Workers who are on strike or locked out of their… Continue reading

Chapman explains votes

Rep. Mike Chapman was among the few Democrats who voted… Continue reading

Democrats Franz, Randall stockpile cash in battle for US House position

Cash is flowing into campaign coffers of two Democrats dueling for an… Continue reading