PT City Council votes to oppose I-2117

State to spend $3.2B from Climate Commitment Act in biennium

PORT TOWNSEND — The Port Townsend City Council passed a motion directing city manager John Mauro to draft a resolution to oppose Initiative 2117, which would repeal the Climate Commitment Act.

The resolution should appear before the council at its next business meeting.

The Climate Commitment Act (CCA) is a cap-and-invest program which dictates that heavy polluters must purchase carbon allowances above a set cap.

There are a limited number of allowances to be purchased, and that number is planned to be reduced incrementally until carbon emissions reach 95 percent below 1990 levels in 2050.

Funds raised through carbon allocations are to be spent on projects aimed at the reduction of carbon emissions, such as conservation, clean building and clean transportation projects.

The Legislature appropriated $3.2 billion from the CCA for the 2023-2025 biennium following the sale of $2.15 billion at the first allowances auction in February 2023.

In his introduction to the agenda item Monday, Mauro said city staff members could not appear to either oppose or support the initiative.

“The reason why we’re bringing this very high-level summary to you is because we don’t want to stray into territory of advocating or presenting a lopsided view of which way you should go on this,” Mauro said. “I heard from council. This is an initiative that you wanted weigh in on, and it’s really up to staff to bring you information so you can make a decision.”

Mayor David Faber made his opposition to the initiative clear.

“Externalities of choosing to live remotely, or choosing to use polluting heat systems shouldn’t just have to be borne by the rest of us,” he said. “The Climate Commitment Act is an attempt to address those externalities and in fact use economic pressure to encourage people to choose less destructive methods of behavior. We already in our energy code and building code require newcomers and young people to bear the cost of avoiding or mitigating climate change, but we have very few tools to actually encourage those who are incumbent homeowners, or have existing vehicles and so forth to make different choices.”

“I’m very much in favor of opposing Initiative 2117, which, I think, if passed, would be destructive not just in our state, but the entire world,” Faber said.

Council member Ben Thomas said he was wary to put his thumb on the scale in recommending what the citizens would vote for.

Thomas is the chair of the Jefferson Transit Authority board, which he said will likely benefit from the initiative failing. Also, he cares personally about the topic, noting he rode his bike to Monday’s council meeting, but he felt that supporting the motion did not fit his idea of his role as a council member.

“I agree with a lot of what you say,” Thomas said. “I just would want to point out that, unfortunately, the way it works out is a lot of people that don’t have the income are dealing with old furnaces in their houses, without the means to upgrade, and driving cars that have worse mileage, and having to drive to work, especially now that it’s harder to choose the housing you might want to choose.”

Faber said he agreed with Thomas’ points. Council member Neil Nelson also affirmed Thomas’ points, but they were not sufficient to sway either from taking action in favor of retaining the CCA.

“I kind of agree with what Ben just had to say,” Nelson said. “But this is important. I get it, for those who need to use fuel, but nonetheless, it’s a tax on using that and it works in our favor all the way around. We should oppose this, period.”

The motion passed, with Thomas opposing.

Thomas later said his decision to vote against the the motion would have been the same if council had voted to recommend drafting a resolution in support of I-2117.

“I feel like I am here to amplify (local) voices upwards, not amplify the government to the people,” Thomas said. “I can communicate what’s going on in government, but I am not gonna tell them what to think or what to do.”

________

Reporter Elijah Sussman can be reached by email at elijah.sussman@sequimgazette.com.

More in News

Peninsula Behavioral Health head discusses the fallout from federal bill

Anticipated cuts to Medicaid could devastate rural communities like Clallam County, leading… Continue reading

Tool library to open in Port Townsend

Drills, saws and more available to borrow

Fire restriction implemented on federal lands

Olympic National Forest and Olympic National Park have restricted campfires… Continue reading

Interdependence Day celebration set for Sunday

Chimacum will host its 14th Interdependence Day celebration on Sunday.… Continue reading

Matthew P. Deines, Outgoing President/CEO, First Fed
First Fed CEO resigns

Bank begins search for replacement

PAHS class of 1975 reunion planned

The Port Angeles High School Class of 1975 is… Continue reading

Lower Elwha Klallm Tribal Chairwoman Frances Charles, left, speaks about the Paddle to Elwha 2025 canoe journey as Carmen Watson-Charles, the tribe’s cultural manager, holds an informational pamphlet during a presentation to the Port Angeles Chamber of Commerce on Wednesday. (Keith Thorpe/Peninsula Daily News)
Thousands expected for canoe journey this month

Tribe anticipates speeches, songs and traditional dance

Glass recycling returns to Jeffco

Port Townsend, Quilcene locations available

Port of Port Townsend OKs update to its strategic plan

Commissioners discuss economic development

Reservoir project to start this weekend

Lower water pressure expected through Aug. 1

Forks institutes voluntary water conservation measures

The city of Forks is requesting residents to follow voluntary… Continue reading