Your chances of dying in the next 10 years? A test offers a clue
By LINDSEY TANNER
The Associated Press
Print This | Email This
Impasse in talks between police-fire unions, Port Angeles City Hall -- 5/21/13 -06:14 PM
Peninsula infested with tent caterpillars -- 5/21/13 -06:13 PM
Jobless rates return to single digits on Peninsula -- 5/21/13 -04:37 PM
FOUR DAYS OF arts and music comes to Port Angeles — buy your tickets now! (And . . . FREE pre-festival show Thursday) -- 5/19/13 -04:43 PM
Heart of Service recipients tip collective hat to community -- 5/21/13 -06:14 PM
WILL YOU LIVE UNTIL 2023?The so-called mortality test is relatively simple.
The 12 items on the index are assigned points; fewer total points means better odds.
• Men automatically get 2 points. In addition to that, men and women ages 60 to 64 get 1 point; ages 70 to 74 get 3 points; and 85 or over get 7 points.
• Two points each: a current or previous cancer diagnosis, excluding minor skin cancers; lung disease limiting activity or requiring oxygen; heart failure; smoking; difficulty bathing; difficulty managing money because of health or memory problem; difficulty walking several blocks.
• One point each: diabetes or high blood sugar; difficulty pushing large objects, such as a heavy chair; being thin or normal weight.
It's hardly surprising that a sick, older person would have a much higher chance of dying than someone younger and more vigorous, and it's well known that women generally live longer than men.
But why would being overweight be less risky than being of normal weight or slim?
One possible reason is that thinness in older age could be a sign of illness, researchers said.
Other factors could also play a role, so the index should be seen as providing clues but not the gospel truth, the research suggests.
The highest, or worst, score is a 26, with a 95 percent chance of dying within 10 years.
To get that, you'd have to be a man at least 85 years old with all the above conditions.
For a score of zero, which means a 3 percent chance of dying within 10 years, you'd have to be a woman younger than 60 without any of those infirmities – but at least slightly overweight.
– The Associated Press
Want to know your chances of dying in the next 10 years?
Here are some bad signs: getting winded walking several blocks, smoking and having trouble pushing a chair across the room.
That's according to a "mortality index" developed by San Francisco researchers for people older than 50.
The test scores may satisfy people's morbid curiosity, but the researchers say their 12-item index is mostly for use by doctors.
It can help them decide whether costly health screenings or medical procedures are worth the risk for patients unlikely to live 10 more years.
It's best to take the test with a doctor, who can discuss what the score means in the context of patients' own medical history, the study authors say.
The index "wasn't meant as guidance about how to alter your lifestyle," said lead author Dr. Marisa Cruz of the University of California, San Francisco.
Instead, doctors can use the results to help patients understand the pros and cons of such things as rigorous diabetes treatment, colon cancer screening and tests for cervical cancer.
Those may not be safe for very sick, old people likely to die before cancer ever develops.
The findings were published Tuesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Grants from the National Institute on Aging and the American Federation for Aging Research helped pay for the study.
The researchers created the index by analyzing data on almost 20,000 Americans over 50 who took part in a national health survey in 1998.
They tracked the participants for 10 years. Nearly 6,000 participants died during that time.
Dr. Stephan Fihn, a health quality measurement specialist with Veterans Affairs health services in Seattle, said the index seems valid and "methodologically sound."
But he said it probably would be most accurate for the oldest patients, who don't need a scientific crystal ball to figure out their days are numbered.
Mortality test: bit.ly/QeOX23 (p. 807)
Last modified: March 05. 2013 11:29PM