PENINSULA POLL BACKGROUNDER: South Dakota becomes latest state to arm schoolteachers
The Associated Press
Print This | Email This
8th UPDATE — Canadian truck with permit to cross saw bridge collapse in his rearview mirror [**GALLERY**] -- 5/24/13 -10:47 AM
5th UPDATE — I-5 bridge collapses near Mount Vernon, tossing people, vehicles into Skagit River. 3 injured, no deaths -- 5/23/13 -11:54 PM
LEE HORTON'S OUTDOORS COLUMN: Halibut derby this weekend -- 5/23/13 -06:31 PM
Hundreds attend funeral of Port Angeles teen -- 5/23/13 -05:53 PM
Juan de Fuca Festival brings performers to Peninsula from around the world -- 5/23/13 -05:57 PM
But it’s not the first state to arm teachers.
For a dozen years, Utah has allowed teachers and others with concealed-carry licenses to wear a gun in a public school.
A couple of school districts in Texas have been given written authorization to allow guns in schools.
And legislatures in other states, including Georgia, New Hampshire and Kansas, are working on measures similar to South Dakota’s, which Daugaard signed into law Friday and takes effect July 1.
Supporters said the so-called sentinels could help prevent tragedies such as December’s shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Conn., in which 20 students and six teachers died.
The bill’s main sponsor, Rep. Scott Craig, R-Rapid City, said he started working with federal law enforcement officials on the measure in early November, and the Connecticut tragedy weeks later “only affirmed the rightness of this bill.”
He said the measure does not force a school district to arm its teachers or force teachers to carry a gun.
“There’s no mandating of anything. It’s provisional. It’s a take-it-or-leave-it bill,” he said.
Several representatives of school boards, school administrators and teachers opposed the bill during committee testimony last month.
They said the measure could make schools more dangerous, lead to accidental shootings and put guns in the hands of people who are not adequately trained to shoot in emergency situations.
Rob Monson, executive director of School Administrators of South Dakota, said his group opposes the bill because it fails to address key issues, such as school building safety, mental health and fire and emergency response.
“We were really hoping that they would look at doing a more comprehensive study of school safety overall, and not sort of jump right into arming people in our schools and thinking that is the answer to it all,” Monson said.
But Craig said a number of school board members and administrators voiced support for the bill.
“There are plenty of school districts that let us know that they’ve wanted this, and they’ve wanted this kind of provision for quite some time,” he said.
Last modified: March 09. 2013 6:07PM